Purdue Semiconductor Fabrication 101 Notes
I recently completed the free online course from Purdue Semiconductor Fabrication 101 and took some random notes.
finfet
Chenming Hu at UC Berkley
planar transistors harder to turn off when very small (expected sub 100nm but Intel used until 32nm)
1996 at 250nm, DARPA requests ideas for sub 25nm
1999 first finfet
2011 Intel switches to finfet at 22nm
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fin_field-effect_transistor
https://spectrum.ieee.org/how-the-father-of-finfets-helped-save-moores-law
https://spectrum.ieee.org/the-origins-of-intels-new-transistor-and-its-future
utb soi: ultrathin-body silicon-on-insulator
layer of insulator with thin layer of insulator on top
for 20nm transistor size, need 5nm silicon (stated in 2011)
bsim: https://bsim.berkeley.edu/ mosfet spice
resistance changes with applied electric field to its surface (applied by the gate - gates current from source to drain)
in 50 years, 1e10 (ten billion) times as many transistors per chip
smaller means lower cost per transistor, less distance so faster (smaller gate delay), less matter so lower power
Modern Semiconductor Devices for Integrated Circuits
there are intel commercials…
ribbon fet, variable width stacks going through the gate (gate all around GAA)
MOS metal oxide (insulator) semiconductor
attracting the few free electrons to the gate with voltage applied
alpha = activity factor is what fraction of clock events that gate switches. clock is 100%, many are 1-10%
perf increased with drive current and min capacitance
switching energy per op is independent of drive current
energy per op reduced by minimizing voltage and cap
cpu clock frequency limited by delay
CMOS complemntary (low stand-by power). combines a pmos and nmos, each turns on in turn to tie output to vdd or ground
low power because no direct path from vdd to ground
negative gate voltage / positive gate voltage
smaller die size can give higher yield
I still don’t quite understand the physical arrangement of gates for a single CMOS (PMOS NMOS pair). they share a gate right? okay N and P are next to each other (or stacked for newer technologies)
NMOS conducts from free electrons, PMOS conducts from holes
next step is 3d stacked cmos where n is stacked over p
wfm - work function metal
analog and sram scale less well with logic in decreasing size. so choose the right size for each and combine as chiplets. interposer is a passive interconnect
podbean was awful. but podcasts are nice
jack kilby integrated circuit nobel lecture
gate-last high-k/metal gate formation : building&removing a temporary gate to place dielectric on fins
dielectric on gate: dielectric layered on top, etched on sides to fill with contact. contacts then get thinned and capped, then contact patch is etched away to expose buried wire
design: combination logic, sequential logic, and timing constraints
80% of effort towards fixing design bugs
technology library and __
foundries / fabless since 80s/90s
x-compact test compression
pat gelsinger ieee cost per test per transistor constant
strained silicon __
there is some repetition in the videos
oxidation: sio2 good insulator 9eV bandgap vs 1.1eV si
gate oxides ~ 10nm to field (separating transistors) 1 um
oxidation rate exponentially dependent on temperature
p type dopant B_oron | n type dopant Ph_osphorus As_rsenic |
dopant is thermal diffusion or ion implant
oxidation also used as mask for the dopant
oxidation involves a volume expansion ~2.2x (thickness SiO2 layer / Si layer)
90nm gen: 1.2 nm SiO2 ~ 5 atomic layers amorphous sio2
dry oxidation (with O2) no hydroxyl (H2) so less bridging so denser. wet oxdiation (with H20) does and so can expand more
sio2 growth kinetic (deal grove) model: oxygen has to diffuse through sio2 layer to get to sio2/si boundary and react. uses three fluxes in atomsphere, in oxide, and into si. for thin oxides, growth linear with time. for thick oxides, growth parabolic with time
can use color chart to judge oxide layer thickness by thin-film interference. but the colors repeat at integer multiples
si/sio2 interface: fixed oxide charge (don’t change during operation), interface charges from crystal (do change during operation), mobile oxide charge from contamination (column 1 Na K), oxide trapped charge
characterize si/sio2 interface with a C-V meter (dc sweep with ac), measure current. C effective is series of C oxide and C diffusion through crystal
k is dielectric constant
thin (< 1 nm) sio2 has higher leakage current from tunneling. decrease d is desirable to get higher gate capacitance, so instead we increase k using high-k like hafnium Hf (applied through atomic layer deposition)
ion implantation: control doping position and depth
doping was mainly thermal diffusion, now ion implantation
dopants only electrically active if replace a Si in the crystal structure (substituiontal and not interstitial). which is why ion implantation uses a thermal annealing step to repair crystal damage
thermal diffusion masking is usually sio2 (much lower dopant diffusivity than Si)
diffusion drives dopant from area of high concentration to low
predeposition gets dopant in to an average depth (curve looks like a falling parabola in log concentration)
drive-in: (sometimes after capping with sio2) no dopant in atomsphere, heat to further diffuse the dose deeper and equalize the concentration more
ion source can be impure, use mass turning magnet to filter by mass
raster scan to cover wafer, uses mask (thick(er) sio2, photoresist)
concentration profile can be a gaussian with peak below the surface (at mean depth “projected range” and stddev “straggle”). model is a combination of electronic drag and nuclear collisions
healing an amorphous layer is easier than individualized regions
implant with 6-7 deg tilt to reduce channeling (flying through the gaps in crystal without interaction)
can anneal at varying power density & time (thermal at one end and pulsed laser at the other)
k1 * lam/na k1 includes things like aberration. either decrease wavelength or increase na (related to half angle). k1 >= 0.25
decreasing masking pitch increases the diffraction angle so diffraction orders 1 and -1 move radially outwards to the edge of a lens (for a given size lens). once they move beyond the lens radius, image contrast is lost. but then increase from point to cone illumination so the size of the diffraction spots grows so large that they overlap (like a venn diagram). then the inner portion isn’t being used, so go annular. can eliminate the non-overlapping ring dipole illumination. then use micro mirrors to give light shape control
computational lithography: starting from target shape, iteratively refine light shape and mask pattern to get the best result. does this first with critical subset (I think to converge on as few different light shapes as possible), then fix that (few) light shape and update the rest of the mask (OPC optical proximity correction)
DUV: 135nm, EUV: 13nm
wet chemical etching -> reactive ion etching (gas cold plasma < 1% ionization). also a gas phase etching
HF etches sio2 at rate of 1nm/sec at room temp
rates can be dependent on crystal plane (100 refers to the plane perpinducular to the vector along x)
equipment manufacturers: asml, lam research, tokyo electron limited TEL, applied materials AMAT
reactive ion etching RIE (plasma): electrons stick onto a grounded wafer and then the ions are attracted (like cl) to bond with si, then argon bombards and you get sicl4 flying off. can monitor progress from emission spectra. needs line of sight from top to etch
Strain-induced Self-Rolled-up Membrane wow
thin film deposition: chemical, physical, or liquid vapor deposition
intel 14nm process ~ 2000 steps
epitaxy epi, meaning “above”, and taxis, meaning “in ordered manner”
pvd physical vapor deposition (evaporation or sputtering): for metal heat with current and it evaporates and deposits. ~0.5 nm/s
cvd chemical vapor deposition: goes through chemical reaction; si epitaxy uses sih4 (silene) adsorbs, then 2h2 break off and the si joins the crystal
for si: 100 is the cubic unit structure, 111 is the hexagonal
si substrate 175 um, epitaxial layer 5-25 um
“modern channels use si gn (silicon germanium) alloy”
plasma: mobile electrons can create ions (knocking out another electron from an atom/molecule), dissociate molecules, and excite molecules; wide energy distribution of mixture of products; frequency and power of source (eg 13.56mhz and 360khz (?))
intel 14nm: trigate finfet looks like 2 prong fork with 3 prong fork gate. 8nm fin width and 42nm fin pitch
ald atomic layer deposition: eg al203 aluminum oxide for high k dielectric, top si layer is oxidized with oh, aluminum tri-methyl (remember methane is ch4 methyl is one less hydrogen so alch3(3) aluminum is 3), the oxygen on the surface kicks out a methyl so every si is bonded to alch3(2), purge chamber and add h20 to oxidize the exposed methyls, repeat steps to continue growing al203. is a self-limited surface reaction
Piranha solution/etch: sulfuric acid (H2SO4) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2)
back end of line interconnects and packaging
al has lower thin film resistivity than cu
cmp chemical mechano polishing: top layer isn’t perfectly flat, etching an uneven surface just propagates that so need planarization. non flat surfae can effect litho since would need light to hit a larger depth of field. cmp usually used after over-applying a material like copper
lab demos: oxidation in gas tube furnace, thermal diffusion/annealing, photoresist in spin coater, photolithography karl suss mjb3, tmah hot wet etch, plasma therm dry etch, pvd sputtering chromium in an argon plasma (dc 250v 20w -> 240w at 30w/min increase I think for metals, ac/rf for dielectrics) pvd sd-400, cvd of amorphous or polysilicon (depending on temperature) in protemp furnace, ald cambridge nanotech fiji f200